Trump lawyers admit ex-president could be indicted in Mar-a-Lago probe
The court filing is the first from Mr Trump that acknowledges he could face criminal charges
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Attorneys for former president Donald Trump have admitted that the twice-impeached ex-president could face federal criminal charges as a result of his hoarding more than 100 classified, government-owned documents at his Palm Beach, Florida, home.
In a filing before Raymond Dearie, the ex-president’s lawyers said they would object to Judge Dearie’s plan for determining whether any of the 100 documents which bear classification markings are privileged because it would require them to say whether Mr Trump actually declassified them.
“The Draft Plan requires that the Plaintiff disclose specific information regarding declassification to the Court and to the Government. We respectfully submit that the time and place for affidavits or declarations would be in connection with a Rule 41 motion that specifically alleges declassification as a component of its argument for return of property,” they wrote. “Otherwise, the Special Master process will have forced the Plaintiff to fully and specifically disclose a defense to the merits of any subsequent indictment without such a requirement being evident in the District Court’s order”.
The reference to “any subsequent indictment” is the first acknowledgment from Mr Trump’s side that the Department of Justice investigation into whether he violated laws governing the proper care and storage of national defence information or prohibiting obstruction of justice could place him in significant legal jeopardy.
The ex-president and some of his allies have claimed on numerous occasions that he issued sweeping declassification orders which negate the classification markings on the myriad documents which have been recovered from his home and office in a court-authorised search. But Mr Trump’s attorneys have not specifically raised that defence in any court filing or appearance thus far. Legal experts say this is an indicator that no such order was ever issued or carried out. If an attorney makes a knowingly false statement in court, he or she could lose his or her law license.
Mr Trump has also repeatedly described the Department of Justice probe as a politically-motivated “witch hunt” by partisan actors in his successor’s administration. Although the former president has said an indictment would not prevent him from mounting a third bid for the presidency in 2024, he strongly hinted that his supporters would react violently were he to face any criminal charges.
During an appearance on the Hugh Hewitt show last week, Mr Trump threatened ‘big problems’ for the US if he ever appears in the dock.
“I think if it happened, I think you'd have problems in this country the likes of which perhaps, we've never seen before. I don't think the people of the United States would stand for it,” he said.
Asked what kinds of problems he was predicting if he were to be charged with a crime, Mr Trump added ominously: “I think you’d have big problems — big problems”.
“I just don’t think they [his supporters] would stand for it. They will not,” he said. “They will not sit still and stand for this ultimate of hoaxes”.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments